/
•
•
Context is everything.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
The antitrust agency’s two orders against the tech giant (and the associated penalties) are unlikely to change anything soon.
Editor's note: The Competition Commission of India has come down heavily on Google. In the past two weeks, the antitrust regulator has passed two orders against the company for anti-competitive behaviour. Both orders involved large penalties by the CCI’s standards—Rs 1,338 crore and Rs 936 crore. The big question that was asked (and answered) in both orders was if there is a substitute for Google’s services in India. The CCI has concluded that there is not. Unsurprisingly, it found Google to be dominant in all the sectors it investigated. It also found Google to be abusing that dominant position and, hence, in contravention of multiple sections of the Competition Act. “It cannot be denied that Indian consumers, [manufacturers] and app developers have been deprived of choice due to anti-competitive practices of Google in the relevant markets,” the regulator said in its first order. “The plea that there is no consumer or competition harm is not tenable…”Competition Commission of India Both orders are fairly comprehensive and one of the first significant instances of action taken against a big tech company in India. The …
The antitrust agency’s two orders against the tech giant (and the associated penalties) are unlikely to change anything soon.
Editor's note: The Competition Commission of India has come down heavily on Google. In the past two weeks, the antitrust regulator has passed two orders against the company for anti-competitive behaviour. Both orders involved large penalties by the CCI’s standards—Rs 1,338 crore and Rs 936 crore. The big question that was asked (and answered) in both orders was if there is a substitute for Google’s services in India. The CCI has concluded that there is not. Unsurprisingly, it found Google to be dominant in all the sectors it investigated. It also found Google to be abusing that dominant position and, hence, in contravention of multiple sections of the Competition Act. “It cannot be denied that Indian consumers, [manufacturers] and app developers have been deprived of choice due to anti-competitive practices of Google in the relevant markets,” the regulator said in its first order. “The plea that there is no consumer or competition harm is not tenable…”Competition Commission of India Both orders are fairly comprehensive and one of the first significant instances of action taken against a big tech company in India. The …
Delhi High Court takes aim at the search giant’s AdWords model, ruling that keyword bidding on trademarks constitutes infringement.
AI is set to disrupt the sector. While the path ahead looks tough for legacy publishers like S Chand Publishing and Arihant Publications, things don’t look encouraging for others in the industry either.
The tech giant’s latest advertising tool purely hinges on the idea that visibility is the new currency in quick-commerce advertising. It's time for the likes of Blinkit and Instamart to adapt to this new reality, and find ways to make the most of it.
Delhi High Court takes aim at the search giant’s AdWords model, ruling that keyword bidding on trademarks constitutes infringement.
AI is set to disrupt the sector. While the path ahead looks tough for legacy publishers like S Chand Publishing and Arihant Publications, things don’t look encouraging for others in the industry either.
The tech giant’s latest advertising tool purely hinges on the idea that visibility is the new currency in quick-commerce advertising. It's time for the likes of Blinkit and Instamart to adapt to this new reality, and find ways to make the most of it.
