What’s holding back Bank of Maharashtra?
Under its current CEO, the lender has witnessed a turnaround in the last four years. Yet, its rising exposure to corporate loans and high levels of stressed assets remain concerns.
8 May, 2023•12 min
0
8 May, 2023•12 min
0
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Why read this story?
Editor's note: April 2017. Bank of Maharashtra had just declared its fourth quarter results for the 2016-17 fiscal year and they were not a pretty sight. Its gross bad loan ratio was at 16.93%, and had risen by 65% over a year. The bank’s capital was eroding fast and its capital adequacy ratio had plummeted to 11.18%—well below the Reserve Bank of India’s 12% minimum. The net loss for the year was over Rs 1,300 crore; every quarter in the fiscal had thrown up a loss. A concerned RBI had no option but to intervene. With depleting capital, rising bad loans and mounting losses, the bank was fast sliding to a point of no return. So, in June 2017, it placed it under the prompt corrective action, or PCA, framework—a structured early-intervention mechanism for banks that become undercapitalized due to poor asset quality, or vulnerable due to loss of profitability. As a consequence, strictures were placed on the bank’s lending activities. A year and a half later, in December 2018, when the current managing director and CEO of the bank—A.S. Rajeev—took charge, …
More in Business
Business
UAE rewrites crypto rules to raise the bar
The Capital Market Authority consolidates oversight, tightens compliance and reworks how virtual assets operate in the country.
You may also like
Internet
RBI’s fraud fix could give banks a headache
The regulator’s proposals to introduce checks and safety features in instant payments, if implemented, may end up testing banks.
Business
HDFC Bank’s supposed can of worms needs to be opened and investigated
Atanu Chakraborty’s resignation does not appear as damaging as the bank’s response to it. The ‘all is well’ narrative needs an independent audit.
Business
The Rs 590-crore blame game at IDFC First Bank
Divergent narratives from the Haryana government and the lender raise deeper questions on oversight, authorizations and systemic lapses—answers that may emerge only after a forensic audit.