With Agnipath, New Delhi keeps the anti-India pot simmering in Kathmandu
Insensitivity has been a hallmark of Indian policy towards Nepal, highlighted once again by India’s insistence that Nepal’s Gorkhas be recruited under the scheme.
Why read this story?
Editor's note: On one of his trips to New Delhi after the 2015 earthquake, the then Indian ambassador to Kathmandu, Ranjit Rae, met Prime Minister Narendra Modi at his official residence. The first question that Modi asked Rae was: “Why don’t they like us?” We have done so much for Nepal, and this is how they respond, he claimed. Modi was speaking as the prime minister, but his anguish was also a reflection of the frustration within the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the organization in which he was ideologically baptized and trained as a pracharak before being sent to the Bharatiya Janata Party. Nepal was then close to finalizing a new constitution and was emphatic in choosing to be a secular republic. The RSS and its affiliates had been trying very hard to push the country into becoming a “Hindu Rashtra” again. Kathmandu alleged that pressure was being brought upon by the leaders of India’s newly elected BJP government in one-to-one meetings as well. (Sri Sri Ravi Shankar even openly canvassed for Nepal to be a Hindu Rashtra.) Contrary to popular belief in …
More in Chaos
You may also like
India needs to stop courting the US and look for a solid plan B
It’s never a good sign when your foreign minister needs a lobbyist to meet US officials. The recent events signal a breakdown in the Modi government’s ability to operate in today’s Washington through its own machinery.
What China’s recent Middle East tour says about their ties
China’s expanding influence in the GCC region comes with its own set of opportunities—and constraints shaped by America’s influence in the Gulf.
Annus horribilis: 2025 was the year India learned it wasn't indispensable
It is the logical consequence of foreign policy built on a decade of illusion rather than the realities of power. The question is whether anyone in the government has the courage to admit it.