/
•
•
Context is everything.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
Detailed stories on technology startups, business and economic current affairs.
Government makes a mockery of the consultation process to amend the Forest (Conservation) Act, issues a guideline that mirrors the very change it is seeking to effect.
Editor's note: In early October, the environment ministry quietly initiated public consultations on certain changes it wanted to make to India’s main law for conservation of forests—the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980—by issuing a consultation paper which describes the proposed amendments. Initially, the ministry only gave 15 days for people to send their feedback. But, responding to public criticism and suggestions, this was increased to 30 days. Subsequently, the ministry came out with translated versions of the consultation paper in multiple languages, ostensibly for wider consultations. Environment minister Bhupender Yadav, in an interview to The Hindu, also appeared to suggest that no changes will be made before “several rounds of consultations” with states. And yet, six days before the public consultation period was to end, the environment ministry wrote a letter to state governments informing them that it had taken a decision on how ecotourism activities in forest areas, which involve construction or development of temporary structures, are to be regulated under the Forest (Conservation) Act, by making a change in its handbook. It stated that such activities are not to be classified …
Government makes a mockery of the consultation process to amend the Forest (Conservation) Act, issues a guideline that mirrors the very change it is seeking to effect.
Editor's note: In early October, the environment ministry quietly initiated public consultations on certain changes it wanted to make to India’s main law for conservation of forests—the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980—by issuing a consultation paper which describes the proposed amendments. Initially, the ministry only gave 15 days for people to send their feedback. But, responding to public criticism and suggestions, this was increased to 30 days. Subsequently, the ministry came out with translated versions of the consultation paper in multiple languages, ostensibly for wider consultations. Environment minister Bhupender Yadav, in an interview to The Hindu, also appeared to suggest that no changes will be made before “several rounds of consultations” with states. And yet, six days before the public consultation period was to end, the environment ministry wrote a letter to state governments informing them that it had taken a decision on how ecotourism activities in forest areas, which involve construction or development of temporary structures, are to be regulated under the Forest (Conservation) Act, by making a change in its handbook. It stated that such activities are not to be classified …
The window to prevent the worst impacts of climate change has shut. The heat is on global leaders at the annual climate talks in Brazil to deliver more than just theatre.
The Kanjurmarg landfill, operated by Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd., is safe from the axe for now. But its fate remains a major source of worry for the company's shareholders and the city's residents alike.
An environmental hazard has spawned the need for these quick fixes, but do they really work?
The window to prevent the worst impacts of climate change has shut. The heat is on global leaders at the annual climate talks in Brazil to deliver more than just theatre.
The Kanjurmarg landfill, operated by Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd., is safe from the axe for now. But its fate remains a major source of worry for the company's shareholders and the city's residents alike.
An environmental hazard has spawned the need for these quick fixes, but do they really work?
